What is EBITDA & Is It Reliable?


EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) is a metric that often sparks lively debate among financial professionals. Stripping out the cost of certain expenses may provide a clearer picture of operational performance, but is it always reliable? Understanding EBITDA’s limitations is crucial for obtaining accurate company valuations and financial analyses. In this article, we’ll explore the depths of EBITDA, offering a detailed perspective for banking professionals.

EBITDA, Explained

EBITDA is a financial metric that provides an overview of a company’s operational performance. By including interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, EBITDA attempts to offer the cash profit of an organization’s earnings from its core business operations. 

Key Components:

Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT): EBIT represents operating income. This figure excludes non-operating income, interest expenses, and taxes, focusing solely on the profitability of primary business activities.

Depreciation and Amortization: These are non-cash expenses related to the aging of tangible and intangible assets. Depreciation accounts for the wear and tear of physical assets like machinery and buildings, while amortization pertains to the reduction in value of intangible assets such as patents, trademarks, and software.

EBITDA is particularly popular in industries with significant capital investments, such as telecommunications and manufacturing, where depreciation can be substantial. It allows stakeholders to focus on the earnings generated by operational activities, disregarding the effects of financing and accounting decisions. This metric can also be instrumental in assessing a company’s ability to generate profits before the influence of its capital structure, tax regime, and investment decisions.

How to Calculate EBITDA

Net Income is the total profit of a company after all expenses, including interest and taxes, have been deducted. The calculation requires you to add back interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. These figures can be found in the income statement and the notes on the financial statements.


EBITDA = Net Income + Interest + Taxes + Depreciation + Amortization


If a company has a net income of $500,000, interest expenses of $50,000, taxes of $100,000, depreciation of $200,000, and amortization of $100,000, the EBITDA would be:

$500,000 + $50,000 + $100,000 + $200,000 + $100,000 = $950,000

Is EBITDA Reliable for Cash Flow?

While EBITDA is a useful indicator of operational profitability, it is not synonymous with cash flow. Several key limitations can make it unreliable for accurately assessing a company’s cash-generating ability. Here are some of the main reasons why EBITDA might not provide a complete picture of cash flow:

Exclusion of Interest and Taxes

By ignoring interest and taxes, EBITDA overlooks actual cash outflows crucial for debt repayment and shareholder returns. Interest payments are a real cash expense that can significantly impact a company’s financial health, especially for highly leveraged companies. Similarly, taxes are inevitable cash outflows that can vary widely based on jurisdiction and tax planning strategies.

Non-Cash Expenses

Depreciation and amortization are non-cash expenses, yet they represent the wear and tear on assets. Ignoring these can misrepresent the financial health of asset-intensive businesses. While these expenses do not involve actual cash transactions, they indicate the future capital expenditure requirements needed to maintain or replace these assets.

Working Capital Changes

EBITDA does not account for changes in working capital, which can significantly impact cash flow. A company might show a strong EBITDA while struggling with cash due to high receivables or inventory levels. For instance, if a company extends generous credit terms to its customers, it may report high sales and EBITDA, but if it fails to collect cash promptly, its actual cash flow can suffer.

Capital Expenditures

High EBITDA does not necessarily indicate available cash for reinvestment. Capital-intensive industries may have high EBITDA but require substantial capital expenditures, reducing actual cash availability. For example, a manufacturing company may report high EBITDA but need to invest heavily in new machinery and equipment to sustain its operations, thereby limiting the free cash flow available for other uses.

While EBITDA provides a snapshot of operational efficiency, it should be used with other metrics for a comprehensive analysis. Evaluating cash flow statements and considering metrics like Free Cash Flow (FCF) or Cash Flow from Operations (CFO) can offer more insight into a company’s true cash-generating capabilities.

Common Challenges of EBITDA

Interest and Tax Variability

Interest expenses and tax rates can vary significantly between companies, influenced by factors such as debt levels, tax jurisdictions, and accounting practices. By excluding these, EBITDA might obscure important financial obligations and risks. This variability can lead to misleading comparisons, as companies with different capital structures and tax strategies might appear equally profitable when their actual financial health differs significantly.

Capital Expenditure Requirements

Ignoring capital expenditures can be misleading, particularly for capital-intensive industries. High EBITDA might suggest robust financial health, but if significant capital investments are required to maintain operations, actual cash availability may be limited. It can result in companies appearing more profitable on an operational basis than they are in reality, as the need for ongoing investment in physical assets is not reflected.

Depreciation and Amortization Differences

Companies may have different depreciation and amortization schedules based on asset types and accounting policies. It can create inconsistencies when comparing EBITDA across firms. For instance, a company with accelerated depreciation policies might report lower EBIT and EBITDA than a company using straight-line depreciation despite having similar operational performances.

One-Time Items

EBITDA can be distorted by one-time gains or losses. Adjusting for these is essential to obtain a normalized view of a company’s operational performance, but such adjustments require careful consideration and transparency. For example, a company might exclude restructuring charges or gains from the sale of assets to present a more favorable EBITDA, which could mislead stakeholders about its ongoing profitability.

Lack of Standardization

There is no universally accepted standard for calculating EBITDA, which can lead to variations in how it is computed and reported. Different companies might include or exclude certain items based on their own definitions, making direct comparisons challenging. This lack of standardization necessitates a careful review of how EBITDA is derived in each case to ensure accuracy and comparability.

What are Alternatives to EBITDA?

While EBITDA is widely used, several alternative metrics can provide a more nuanced understanding of a company’s financial health. Here are some noteworthy alternatives:

Cash Flow from Operations (CFO)

Cash Flow from Operations (CFO) measures the actual cash generated by a company’s operational activities. Unlike EBITDA, CFO accounts for working capital changes and provides a clearer picture of a company’s ability to generate cash flow to cover operating expenses, interest, and taxes. This metric is particularly useful in assessing the short-term liquidity and operational efficiency of a business, offering a more accurate reflection of cash-generating capabilities.

Free Cash Flow (FCF)

Free Cash Flow (FCF) goes a step further by subtracting capital expenditures from CFO. FCF indicates the cash available for distribution to shareholders, debt repayment, or reinvestment. It is a crucial metric for assessing a company’s financial flexibility and long-term sustainability. Investors and analysts often prefer FCF as it demonstrates the true cash available after maintaining and expanding the asset base, providing insights into the company’s growth potential and financial health.

Net Income

Net Income, or the bottom line, includes all revenues and expenses, providing a comprehensive view of profitability. While it incorporates interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, it reflects the true earnings available to shareholders. Net income is influenced by a wider range of factors than EBITDA, including non-operational items, which can make it a more holistic measure of a company’s overall financial performance.

EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes)

EBIT, or operating income, focuses on the profitability of core operations before interest and tax expenses. It is useful for comparing companies with different tax situations or capital structures but does not add back non-cash expenses like EBITDA. EBIT provides a clear view of operational profitability without the noise introduced by financing and tax decisions, making it a valuable metric for assessing the efficiency of core business activities.

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA modifies standard EBITDA to exclude one-time or non-recurring items, providing a more accurate representation of ongoing operational performance. However, it requires transparency and consistency in the adjustments made. This metric can be particularly useful in industries where one-time events, such as restructuring charges or extraordinary gains, are common, as it offers a normalized view of performance that can aid in more accurate comparisons and evaluations.

Register for Our EBITDA Course to Learn More

While EBITDA can provide a quick, helpful overview of an organization’s operating performance, it isn’t necessarily accurate. With BankersHub’s Why EBITDA Doesn’t Spell Cash Flow course, banking professionals and investors can explore why EBITDA is an unreliable indicator of cash flow. Students will learn about the origin of EBITDA, its problems, and why the SEC is cracking down on it. The course will also introduce alternatives to EBITDA, providing a more accurate, trustworthy approach to gauging operating performances. Whether you’re a credit analyst, credit approver, commercial banker, chief credit officer, loan review officer, or commercial underwriter, this course is for you! BankersHub’s webinars are convenient, offering self-paced playback to fit your busy schedule. Register today to learn more about the pitfalls of EBITDA!  


UDAAP: Avoiding Consumer Harm & Monitoring for Consumer Complaints

September 30, 2024 @ 2:00 pm – 3:00 pm – This lending compliance webinar will review best practices, procedures, and tools to strengthen your UDAAP compliance program, as well as review how to incorporate the requirements of the new Fair Debt Collections Practices Act into your UDAAP program.

Read More »

ACH Basics 3-Part Bootcamp

September 23, 2024 – September 25, 2024 @ 2:00 pm – 3:00 pm – This three-part series focuses on the basics of ACH, including the history of the network, defining the parties of ACH transactions, their roles and responsibilities, and the transaction flow and settlement process. In addition, we will cover all aspects of exception item processing, including your options in handling unauthorized transactions, stop payments and revoked authorizations. […]

Read More »
Cash Flow

Why EBITDA Doesn’t Spell Cash Flow

September 24, 2024 @ 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm – EBITDA (Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) is a popular measure of cash flow, but it is not accurate, and those who rely on it as an indicator of repayment ability will be deeply disappointed

Read More »

More Posts

14 Effective Deposit Growth Strategies for Banks

Banks face significant challenges in growing their deposit bases in an era of unprecedented competition and evolving consumer expectations. Modern financial institutions must deploy innovative and customer-centric strategies to attract

Digital Banking Frauds

9 Types of Digital Banking Frauds to Be Aware Of

The banking industry has undergone a remarkable transformation in the era of digitization, enabling seamless transactions and improved customer experiences. However, with these advancements come sophisticated threats that target digital

What is a Fair Lending Risk Assessment?

A fair lending risk assessment is a critical process financial institutions use to ensure they comply with fair lending regulations. These laws aim to prevent discrimination in lending practices and